Is upgrading to Server from Nebula Pro 3 worth it, using OSX

[jeffbdavis]

I've been on the fence about upgrading to server for a while. I really need 64bit VST so I can upgrade to Mountain Lion, etc. But, hearing things like this is very discouraging.

[greekpeet]

Also, there is a major issue with a 'fragmentation issue' which will result in a crash after using...

...1.2 GB with the 32bit version.

Thats right, according to Gian, you can NOT use or load more than 1.2 GB of libraries without it crashing.

So performance is actually worse.
Why is this not even being mentioned to users?

Also, I'm a very laid back guy that does not get angry over trivial matters at all. If something makes me angry, its for a good darn reason.

To say I'm pissed is an understatement.

To pay extra and have worse performance with the illusion of it being able to 'share' resources.

I know this is a small company that rolls things their own way, I get that, but this is borderline false advertising.

[andiw]

I'm with you greekpeet. Bought also the server for Mac and cannot use it now. 50€ down the drain ...

It's a shame that we Mac users are treated like that

There's no development and the attitude from Acustica Audio is like ..

The problem is: I absolutely love Nebula! I don't wanna use anything else in my mixes ...

[giancarlo]

server version is not ram limited if you open the server app before starting your audio host...

[jelmet]

Sorry to read that...
:/
I think I'll hold upgrading for a while...

[yanickwalker]

64 bit for mac please please please please please!!!