Bricasti M7

Officially Licensed 3rd Party Developer Libraries
Free 3rd Party Programs
burnsound
User Level VIII
User Level VIII
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 9:39 pm

Re: Bricasti M7

Post by burnsound » Thu Dec 30, 2010 2:10 am

Any update on the Bricasti M7 sampling?

cdsoundmaster
Vip Member
Vip Member
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:18 am
Contact:

Re: Bricasti M7

Post by cdsoundmaster » Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:09 am

Hi there,
The best results for the Bricasti are going to come once a new implementation is added to the Neb engine, which is currently in beta. This will possibly be March. I will relay info as it progresses.
burnsound wrote:Any update on the Bricasti M7 sampling?

Veet
User Level II
User Level II
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:04 am

Re: Bricasti M7

Post by Veet » Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:16 am

Given the level of realism that is possible with Nebula already right now, this sounds awesome. But march seems far away... :P

sfunk
Member
Member
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 5:59 pm

Re: Bricasti M7

Post by sfunk » Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:32 pm

cdsoundmaster wrote:Hi there,
The best results for the Bricasti are going to come once a new implementation is added to the Neb engine, which is currently in beta. This will possibly be March. I will relay info as it progresses.
burnsound wrote:Any update on the Bricasti M7 sampling?
Now that is interesting! Can any of you guys comment on this new implementation? Will it make compression easier to capture? I'm still waiting for a Neb 1176!

Stolle
User Level VI
User Level VI
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:27 am

Re: Bricasti M7

Post by Stolle » Fri Dec 31, 2010 3:30 pm

I would guess true stereo.

Post Reply