good post thanks. I agree and would really like to get an impression of Nebula compressors under optimized conditions - whatever they may be.ngarjuna wrote:This is a potential problem with the kind of wild west situation we have with the current "let's tweak the hell out of Nebula" mentalitySWAN wrote:if this helps/stops the problem should it not be implemented into the program?
In terms of it being a 'wild west' - Im not sure...I dont see any bandits around - just trying to get clarity in operation of the programs - and best performance.
The idea that the user needs to handle this great responsibility is a little unfair IMO - because the documentation and instruction is quite obscure and often buried in retrospective forum posts. I also dont think its a question of AA support. If there are specific settings and tweaks that can be made per program - surely it is the responsibility of the developer who sells the program - to give tips for optimal use to get the best out of it?
It just seems crazy to release and sell a program with knowledge that many users will not understand how to get the best out of it.
...if the transient response can be improved - surely that is a key tweak that should be public knowledge with clear instruction...