RATE CNV

Tips & tricks, working results, technical support
Post Reply
farjedi
User Level X
User Level X
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:12 pm

RATE CNV

Post by farjedi » Wed Apr 28, 2010 11:12 pm

Could someone remind me whats the best setting for this?, I recall remembering to raise this when programs exhibit the top end roll off especially with 96khz programs. Does raising this effect any other sound quality?..thanks..

Grim
Member
Member
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 7:30 pm

Re: RATE CNV

Post by Grim » Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:02 am

The recommendation is for anything over 3200.

This only affects the speed that any sample rate conversion is done while loading a program so the only other side-effect is slower loading times.

farjedi
User Level X
User Level X
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:12 pm

Re: RATE CNV

Post by farjedi » Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:20 am

Thanks alot for the info, I just noticed I got a lot of very high frequency roll off on this mix..ah well..:)

kwild
User Level I
User Level I
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:15 pm

Re: RATE CNV

Post by kwild » Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:14 am

The default CVN in nebula is 25ms (25000 in the .xml).
So we must reduce it to (at least) 3,2ms (3200 in the .xml)?

farjedi
User Level X
User Level X
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:12 pm

Re: RATE CNV

Post by farjedi » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:18 pm

I was refering to the MAST page in your Nebula Vst. I think I've always heard that it's best to raise it, so I assume Grim was talking about the MAST page to.

Grim
Member
Member
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 7:30 pm

Re: RATE CNV

Post by Grim » Sat May 01, 2010 2:59 am

Yes 3200 in the master page as recommended by AlexB for his libraries.

It's a big increase from Nebula default & will slow loading of programs but ensures you are getting the highest quality.

powderfinger
User Level III
User Level III
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 1:23 am

Re: RATE CNV

Post by powderfinger » Sun Jun 06, 2010 9:43 pm

Should it read 3200 in the MAST page or in the XML? It is confusing because they are different, as noted by kwild.

vasquez
User Level I
User Level I
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:14 am

Re: RATE CNV

Post by vasquez » Sun Jun 06, 2010 11:14 pm

3200000 should be in the XML and it would show 3200ms in the MAST page. You have to increase the CNV Rate not reduce it

futur2
Member
Member
Posts: 303
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:16 pm

Re: RATE CNV

Post by futur2 » Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:04 am

just remember that a program like vnxt emt140 needs a cnv rate of 6000 to 9000 to work properly! and you won't notice any error if the rate is lower. it's just the sound that is not right!

powderfinger
User Level III
User Level III
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 1:23 am

Re: RATE CNV

Post by powderfinger » Mon Jun 07, 2010 4:25 am

Thanks guys.

Post Reply